The Business > Resources > OnHand Counsel's The Business: Legal Briefing November 2015
OnHand Counsel's The Business: Legal Briefing November 2015



Dear reader

Just the one article in this briefing, because it's very recent and it's a biggie (for lawyers anyway):

English penalties will be missed


Apparently for the last 100 years we have been getting a law wrong.

This law says that a clause in a contract which sets out in advance the consequences of a breach of contract will be unenforceable if it is extravagant, exorbitant or unconscionable. It is one of the few exceptions in UK law to the principle of freedom of contract.

A test for this law was set out by Lord Dunedin in 1915 in the case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd. The test said that a clause was a penalty clause if the consequences are designed as a deterrent to discourage the defaulting party from committing the breach, and are not a ‘genuine pre-estimate’ of the loss that would be suffered by the aggrieved party as a result of the breach.

For the last 100 years this test has become entrenched, and UK lawyers (including me for the last 30 years) have gone around advising businesses to be very careful not to draft a clause which could be construed as a penalty clause and which could therefore be unenforceable.

On 4th November 2015 the UK Supreme Court (what used to be the House of Lords) gave its decisions in two cases which it heard together. The result is that the law of penalties has been turned on its head. The Supreme Court set out a new test of whether a clause is a penalty clause, namely whether the agreed consequences of a breach impose a detriment to the contract breaker out of all proportion to the innocent party’s legitimate interest in the enforcement of the clause that has been breached. It doesn’t then seem to matter whether they are also designed to be a deterrent to discourage the defaulting party from committing the breach.

Read on for answers to some of the questions arising out of this case, including some drafting tips.

YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED

Rating system:
Reading time (1-10 minutes): 10 for the full monty
Sophistication level (1 (idiot) – 10 (expert)): 6
Entertainment value (1 (turgid) – 10 (side-splitting)): 6

In this series of legal briefings I update you about recent developments in corporate or commercial law. Some of these briefings will hopefully resonate with some of you some of the time. I explain some of the context and background law, and perhaps give some specific tips. And maybe ramble or even rant a bit.

If you have any questions about anything raised in any of my legal briefings please do not hesitate to get in touch.

And please remember my two SPECIAL OFFERS:

Special offer #1:

If you get any scoped quote from any traditional full-service law firm’s company commercial department for any work within my areas of expertise, I will 1/ match it; 2/ knock at least 20% off it; and 3/ provide the service with a more experienced level of expertise and service. This is not a one-off offer; it is a permanent offer. It’s just the way it is.

Special offer #2:

Free introductory meeting.

This isn't really a special offer either. I’ve always offered it. If you are a new potential client, I am always happy to meet you so we can introduce each other, learn more about each other and decide if we want to work with each other.
All the best,
Andrew James
OnHand Counsel Limited
This newsletter is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice (even if it looks like it does) and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness (I’m not sure what the difference is but that’s what my precedent says) of the information and commentary set out here, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by OnHand Counsel Limited or by any solicitor, employee or agent of OnHand Counsel Limited, ie particularly me. You have not paid me to provide it to you and I do not owe you any duty of care whatsoever so why should I be liable to you if you go away and do something wrong relying on what I have said in it. If you want to do something and want to rely on my advice, give me some money! Thank you for reading this far.
'No-nonsense, pragmatic but thorough' - latest unsolicited testimonial
See other testimonials
Got an important or complicated deal coming up in your business? Know someone who does? CONTACT ANDREW
by phone
01727 86728901727 867289
or by email
WHY INSTRUCT ONHAND COUNSEL?

Experienced, effective and approachable

Value for money

Just look at all the things Andrew James can help with!

If Andrew can’t help personally he will know an AIBL lawyer or someone else who can
Copyright © 2015 OnHand Counsel Limited, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email as a valued client or contact

Our mailing address is:
OnHand Counsel Limited
114A Old London Rd
St Albans, Hertfordshire AL1 1PU
United Kingdom



   
Banner
Andrew James